Skip to content

NIS2 Autopilot: agent compliance under human oversight

The NIS2 clock starts the moment an incident occurs: 24 hours for an early warning to the CSIRT, 72 hours for the full notification. The board is personally liable. NIS2 Autopilot combines SecurityBridge detection with an AI agent that triages the incident and drafts the report - while a human approves before anything leaves the organisation.

A security alert in SAP at two in the morning. The NIS2 clock has just started.

The organisation has 24 hours to issue an early warning to the CSIRT and 72 hours to submit the full incident notification (NIS2, Art. 23). And failure to meet these obligations is not the responsibility of “the IT department”. It is the personal responsibility of the board (NIS2, Art. 20).

Abstract visualisation of a compliance agent with a clock and shield under human oversight - SNOK Aurora style

The stakes go beyond a fine for the company

  • fines of up to EUR 10 million or 2% of global turnover,
  • personal liability of members of management,
  • a reputation that no press statement can rebuild.

What does this look like in practice? An analyst at dawn manually gathering logs, trying to determine whether the incident exceeds the reporting threshold, and drafting the notification from scratch. The clock is ticking.

NIS2 Autopilot - how it works

There is a better way. NIS2 Autopilot is an agent compliance solution under human oversight, powered by the SecurityBridge platform:

  1. SecurityBridge detects an attack on SAP (RFC RCE, privilege escalation, a suspicious transport).
  2. The agent triages the incident, assesses the NIS2 threshold, maps it to the measures under Art. 21, and gathers supporting evidence.
  3. The agent drafts the 24-hour early warning to the CSIRT and the 72-hour notification - in the required language and in the regulator’s format.
  4. The CISO approves it before anything leaves the organisation.

From alert to a report ready for the regulator - in minutes, not days.

Demonstration of NIS2 Autopilot in action - from detection to draft report

This is not “autopilot without brakes”

This is governed autonomy: the agent thinks, the robot executes, the human decides. Every agentic project at SNOK undergoes a mandatory AI Security review, and the orchestration itself is built on AI agents and agentic automation.

Because compliance that cannot be demonstrated within 24 hours is not compliance. It is only the hope that the auditor will not ask.

We would be pleased to show you this live - on your own scenario, not on a slide. Schedule a 30-minute demo.


Regulatory context: NIS2 Directive (2022/2555), Art. 20-23. Implemented in Poland through the National Cybersecurity System Act.

Found this useful? Please pass it on:

More from this series

Other

Weekly Review W37: the core does not decide, what surrounds it does

Fifteen items from the window of 11 August - 10 September 2026: SAP Security Patch Day with a 10.0 note in the kernel, the network barrier in front of SAP removed, an official MCP server for BTP administration, a benchmark of eight SAP security pillars, a hidden payload in an email summary, OWASP Agentic Skills Top 10, a near-autonomous agentic attack on Taiwan, the harness as the deciding layer, UiPath results, Cartographer, Daniel Dines's book, the ISO 42001 annex trap, a model at critical level in cyber, AI server price rises and Mistral's funding round.

Your AI assistant refuses. That does not mean it is protecting you

The same request goes through once and is turned down the next time, depending on what happened earlier in the conversation. Three measurements show a refusal boundary that moves by tens of percentage points with no configuration change at all - which makes it unfit for the job our documents give it.

512 GB under the desk. Why, after the Lenovo ThinkStation PGX, I am seriously pricing an Apple Mac Studio as SNOK's POC machine

Apple has announced a Mac Studio with the M5 Ultra and 512 GB of unified memory at 1.2 TB/s. I have tested a Lenovo ThinkStation PGX with the NVIDIA GB10 and I carry a 128 GB MacBook every day, so I read the announcement as a purchasing calculation: is this the proof-of-concept and fine-tuning machine for a firm like SNOK? From a distance the price looks absurd. Up close it starts to make sense.

Get in touch