Skip to content

Attacks on SAP – where are you, SAP superhero?

Cyberattacks on SAP systems are becoming increasingly common these days, with attackers gaining network access and then exploring key applications through port scanning and script-based exploration. In Poland too, the level of SAP security is a cause for concern...

These days, cyberattacks on SAP systems are becoming increasingly common, with attackers gaining access to the network and then exploring key applications through port scanning and script-based exploration. In Poland too, the level of SAP security is a cause for concern. Let’s take a look at how to detect these attacks, while adding a touch of humour to what is otherwise a serious matter.

Example 1: Password Lock Attack

A password lock attack involves locking SAP user accounts by repeatedly attempting to log in with incorrect passwords. As a result, users cannot log in and business processes are disrupted. It’s a bit like someone trying to break into a lock with a magic key that becomes more mythical with every wrong attempt.

To detect this type of attack, monitor failed login attempts in your SAP system. A warning sign can be multiple login attempts from a single IP address. In this situation, it’s worth equipping yourself with a superhero-grade radar (such as SecurityBridge software) that will detect uninvited guests.

Example 2: Password Spray Attack

A password spraying attack is another scenario aimed at guessing weak passwords for SAP users. It’s a bit like the attacker drawing password cards, trying to guess which one will work.

To detect this attack, monitor login activity in your SAP system, paying attention to login attempts from a single IP address. If you notice suspicious login attempts, it’s worth considering a cyberattack early-warning system.

Are SAP interfaces particularly exposed?

SAP user interfaces are vulnerable to script-based attacks, because their failed-login counter resets with every successful login. That’s a walk in the park for hackers, who are only waiting for their chance to strike.

How do you detect script-based attacks against SAP?

Want to detect script-based attacks against interface users? Monitor failed login attempts in the SAP Security Audit Log, and when you spot statistical anomalies, respond like the superhero guarding your kingdom.

In summary, script-based attacks on SAP systems are becoming increasingly common, and Poland is no exception. To protect your business operations, monitor failed login attempts and login activity in your SAP system. This way, you can detect password lock attacks, password spraying attacks and attacks on interface users.

However, not everything is as bleak as it may seem. Think of it as a battle between superheroes and cybercriminals - while the threat is real, with the right tools and monitoring you can fight these challenges effectively.

Of course, in reality we won’t have superpowers or wear capes, but keeping up with the latest safeguards and applying regular updates can equip us with the right tools to fend off cyberattacks.

If you need help fighting cybercriminals, remember you can always count on us!

Get in touch with us, and together we’ll save your valuable business information: office@snok.ai

So, dear citizens of the SAP world, here is our SNOK mission: to be like superheroes protecting our systems, capable of detecting and preventing cyberattacks! Join us, and together let’s set a new standard for SAP security in Poland!

Found this useful? Please pass it on:

More from this series

Other

Weekly Review W37: the core does not decide, what surrounds it does

Fifteen items from the window of 11 August - 10 September 2026: SAP Security Patch Day with a 10.0 note in the kernel, the network barrier in front of SAP removed, an official MCP server for BTP administration, a benchmark of eight SAP security pillars, a hidden payload in an email summary, OWASP Agentic Skills Top 10, a near-autonomous agentic attack on Taiwan, the harness as the deciding layer, UiPath results, Cartographer, Daniel Dines's book, the ISO 42001 annex trap, a model at critical level in cyber, AI server price rises and Mistral's funding round.

Your AI assistant refuses. That does not mean it is protecting you

The same request goes through once and is turned down the next time, depending on what happened earlier in the conversation. Three measurements show a refusal boundary that moves by tens of percentage points with no configuration change at all - which makes it unfit for the job our documents give it.

512 GB under the desk. Why, after the Lenovo ThinkStation PGX, I am seriously pricing an Apple Mac Studio as SNOK's POC machine

Apple has announced a Mac Studio with the M5 Ultra and 512 GB of unified memory at 1.2 TB/s. I have tested a Lenovo ThinkStation PGX with the NVIDIA GB10 and I carry a 128 GB MacBook every day, so I read the announcement as a purchasing calculation: is this the proof-of-concept and fine-tuning machine for a firm like SNOK? From a distance the price looks absurd. Up close it starts to make sense.

Get in touch